Review Request: fix for some typos
Commit Hook
null at kde.org
Sat Jun 23 11:51:17 BST 2012
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105278/#review15037
-----------------------------------------------------------
This review has been submitted with commit e643ed3935ef538d9685edc5dbf10c5f36508364 by Jaime Torres to branch KDE/4.8.
- Commit Hook
On June 16, 2012, 3:37 p.m., Jaime Torres Amate wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105278/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated June 16, 2012, 3:37 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for kdelibs.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> 1. Do not want to check m_startDate.isValid() twice and m_endDate.isValid() none.
> 2. why do not want to delete d->authAction if it is nulled after that.
> 3. Is really the code after the break unwanted code?
> 4. if ok is not initialized, sometimes while(ok) could do nothing.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> kdecore/date/kcalendarera.cpp 0a21e37
> kdeui/actions/kaction.cpp 309cf82
> kio/kfile/kpropertiesdialog.cpp feb0c9e
> sonnet/unicode/parseucd/parseucd.cpp 1c9b90e
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105278/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> 6 months or more with it locally.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jaime Torres Amate
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20120623/3287d3cb/attachment.htm>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list