Using userbase for manuals

[Kevin Ottens]

On Sunday 1 July 2012 09:49:11 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> [...]
> My opinion is that I would love to go for it, and if over time that turns
> out to be a problem, we could ship a dump of the relevant wiki content
> along the application. It'd be used as fallback if the wiki cannot be
> reached online.

Actually, after sleeping on it, it made me realize that this point above 
renders the discussion moot from a KDE Frameworks standpoint. On my side I was 
trying to determine if we had a way out from invokeHelp(). But as soon as you 
need this type of extra behavior, you need to have something like 
invokeHelp(), so our solution doesn't lie with the "wiki or docbook" 
discussion.

Anyway, thanks everyone involved for the input provided. It was also a good 
opportunity to evaluate how our current doc team perceive userbase use for 
manuals (although that was just a fringe interest from KDE Frameworks 
perspective), I think the outcome there is pretty clear. :-)

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20120703/fba98427/attachment.sig>