[proposal] Move all of the ksecretsservice components into kdeutils/ksecrets

[Kevin Ottens]

On Saturday 12 November 2011 11:14:35 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> On 11/12/2011 10:11 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Any particular reason why you didn't stick to the separate repo solution
> > as proposed earlier? For some reason I fail to see what motivated your
> > change on that.
> 
> Well, as I explained in other threads, the initial decision I understood
> was to have the components in kdelibs and kde-runtime then. And I did
> stick with that.

Yeah, I know that.

> Please see my response to Aaron.

And that's where my question comes from, I thought the consensus with the 
involved parties after that new discussion was for a new repository, but I 
might have missed something.

So that was the intent of my previous email, now that the red flag got raised 
for inclusion in kdelibs master, why not going for a separate repository? At 
least contrary to inclusion in kdeutils it would avoid the circular dependency 
issue.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20111112/3331917f/attachment.sig>