Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

[Michael Pyne]

On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 10:14:43 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 08:21:02 AM Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> > Just as a side-note on SDO: For me SDO is very close to the KDE
> > development process. If I had my way everyone running KDE master would
> > also use SDO master. But for some reason that would only be acceptable
> > if SDO were in KDE's git...
> 
> It could be integrated into a "virtual" kdesupport, independent from where
> it is hosted.
> doesn't kdesrc-build actually do this ?

SDO is in the git-master kdesrc-buildrc-sample file (commented out).

However, this was only when even I finally couldn't build KDE using system 
packages of SDO, on *Gentoo*. SDO is the first non-Qt/non-KDE project to be 
included in the kdesrc-build sample configuration, and I was semi-surprised 
that it even worked at all.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110607/a0bb4bc0/attachment.sig>