Requested Moratorium on hard to build dependency bumps for KDE 5

[Thiago Macieira]

On Tuesday, 7 de June de 2011 10:14:43 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 08:21:02 AM Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> > Just as a side-note on SDO: For me SDO is very close to the KDE
> > development process. If I had my way everyone running KDE master would
> > also use SDO master. But for some reason that would only be acceptable
> > if SDO were in KDE's git...
> 
> It could be integrated into a "virtual" kdesupport, independent from where
> it is hosted.
> doesn't kdesrc-build actually do this ?

The part "shared-desktop" of the name seems to imply that it's not that close 
to the KDE development process. If they are so close to the KDE development 
process, why aren't they called "kde ontologies" instead?

Otherwise, it looks like people from the other camp who name their 
technologies under generic names like Notifications or libwebkit and pretend 
that they are the official solution for everyone.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110607/dcd6667b/attachment.sig>