Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings" by GNOME
Andrea Diamantini
adjam7 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 25 11:19:19 BST 2011
On 07/24/2011 09:10 PM, Michael Jansen wrote:
> I btw. agree that a kde application outside of a kde workspace should
> be self contained. We could solve that problem btw inside of the kde
> framework even. As Martin masterfully proved systemsettings is a
> workspace application and should not be be required outside of a full
> kde workspace (if someone decides to install it intentionally it
> should still work so the original problem has to be solved anyway.) A
> application could recognize that it is run outside of an active kde
> workspace and add all needed kcms (which should be as less as possible
> ) to its settings menu in that case. But we should really try to
> respect of the active workspaces settings as possible therefore making
> as muss kcms as possible useless in such an environment. Mike
Given that, it seems clear to me that all "important" and "shared" KCMs
should live in kde-runtime. Isn't it?
Regards,
--
Andrea Diamantini, adjam
GPG Fingerprint: 57DE 8E32 7D1A 0E16 AA52 59D8 84F9 3ECD DBF9 730F
rekonq project
WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org
IRC: rekonq at freenode
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list