Review Request: [PATCH] Make KIO::Scheduler correctly re-use ioslaves that have been put on hold...

Andrea Diamantini adjam7 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 4 09:12:12 GMT 2011


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6271/#review9505
-----------------------------------------------------------



/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/scheduler.cpp
<http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6271/#comment10506>

    typo?


- Andrea


On 2011-01-04 05:51:44, Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6271/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-01-04 05:51:44)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> The patch attempts to fix the following two oustanding problems in KIO::Scheduler that have been around for a while (see the possibly related bug reports in the Bugs section above):
> 
> #1. Set the m_checkOnHold flag to true every time Scheduler::publishSlaveOnHold is invoked. Right now that flag is only set to true when an instance of KIO::Scheduler is created. This results in the flag never being true after the first ioslave has been put on hold and reused unless the programmer explicitly calls KIO::Scheduler::checkSlaveOnHold which is not documented at all. See the description about putting ioslaves on hold in KIO::get's API documentation.
> 
> #2. Modify SchedulerPrivate::doJob to correctly set the m_checkOnHold flag for http requests when a job's command is CMD_SPECIAL.  That is necessary because HTTP_POST, which is handled as a special command, can return content just like a get request.
> 
> 
> This addresses bugs 123121 and 148307.
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123121
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148307
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/scheduler.cpp 1209936 
> 
> Diff: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6271/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dawit
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110104/ae2ed4f7/attachment.htm>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list