A Qt replacement for KGlobal::ref and deref

Aaron J. Seigo aseigo at kde.org
Wed Feb 16 16:31:18 GMT 2011


On Wednesday, February 16, 2011, David Jarvie wrote:
> There would be a major benefit from splitting KConfig etc out of kdecore:
> Qt developers could use the stripped down library confident in the
> knowledge that they could use any class in it without having to worry
> about whether they might accidentally introduce a dependence on platformy
> stuff.

it just introduces a new complexity: which of these bazillion libraries do i 
use and what's the overhead of having so many of them? (not to mention the 
complications for us actually making that library).

QtCore isn't a bazillion libraries either.

what i do agree with, however, is that kdecore (as example) does need:

* to be properly documented from a higher level than it is now

* should have KDE platform features separated out from app dev framework 
features

which begs the question: "is KConfig (as ane exmple) platform or app dev"? fun 
conversations to be had and digging to be done :)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110216/f9c66aab/attachment.sig>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list