Use Q_GLOBAL_STATIC where K_GLOBAL_STATIC is not needed?

[Michael Pyne]

On Tuesday, February 15, 2011 00:51:38 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 14 de February de 2011 18:22:20 Michael Pyne wrote:
> > Well to play devil's advocate, is it not possible in theory to make
> > QAtomicPointer derive from QBasicAtomicPointer2 in Qt 4.8, in a way such
> > that users of *only* QAtomicPointer still worked but users of
> > QBasicAtomicPointer broke?
> 
> It is.
> 
> So what you want is for QBasicAtomicXXX to be documented? Sounds fair.

That would be exceedingly nice, yes. I would at least feel less bad about my 
current usage of QBasicAtomicInt (on non-PA-RISC), especially if the statement 
about being POD and non-POD were also to be explicitly added to the API.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110214/84ad5e67/attachment.sig>