git workflow draft

[Michael Pyne]

On Saturday, August 27, 2011 21:27:06 Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Monday, August 22, 2011 11:33:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > Was this decided upon at some point?  I got conflicting stories from
> > sysadmin and other developers.  Yesterday after migrating kdeaccessibility
> > to git I was asked by a sysadmin to rename the X.Y branches to KDE/X.Y  I
> > think concensus and consistency are important here.  Was there a decision
> > that the official branches should be named X.Y?  Is that documented
> > somewhere (I spent some time looking, but didn't find it).
> 
> Yes, this was decided (by a coin flip, natch) at a IRC meeting which was
> preannounced on the various mailing lists.

I see this was discussed more on kde-core-devel where support seems to be for 
KDE/x.y.

Although I flipped the coin that gave us "x.y", I was voting even at the time 
for "KDE/x.y" and fully support switching that "decision" if that's what we 
end up doing.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110827/5f419129/attachment.sig>