git workflow draft

[Thomas Zander]

On Wednesday 24 August 2011 06.20.06 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> My vote goes for the X.Y scheme as the repo is already under the
> KDE namespace.

That information is lost as soon as the repository is cloned, though.

As disc and bandwidth gets cheaper we'll probably see more mirror sites do 
full mirrors of many open source git repositories from lots of different 
sources,  there this would get lost too.

I would be happier with the KDE/x.y solution, personally.
-- 
Thomas Zander