thiago at kde.org
Sun Aug 21 22:10:18 BST 2011
On Sunday, 21 de August de 2011 21:07:05 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 21/08/11 15:23, John Layt wrote:
> > So lets turn that on its head. Lets write a statement saying why we
> > need a spec and what it needs to achieve. Mention we have an existing
> > solution that would be a good starting point, but don't actually
> > detail it. Then send that to xdg and Gnome and Unity and anyone else
> > asking who are the right pople to talk to. Hopefully those people then
> > decide it's a good thing and agree to work together to develop a
> > standard. If they're not interested then we get to draft it ourselves
> > knowing there can be no complaints.
> On the other hand, what's the point of creating a "cross-desktop
> standard" without anyone involved from other desktops? We're just
> creating a KDE standard and slapping a "cross-desktop" label on it,
> which is kind of missing the point.
> Although KGlobalAccel could really do with a nicer D-Bus API.
It wouldn't be the first time someone pushes a spec without a second user of
But the point is that we should open up the discussion and do the work of
elaborating a spec. We have identified a need and we have a solution for it.
I'm sure others see the similar problem, even if they don't have the time for
it now (à la status notifier spec).
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the kde-core-devel