smallish project needed

[Mark]

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabrava at kde.org> wrote:
> juk should be a lightweigth music player, while amarok should be an
> all-featured media player. I say should because juk is in a stage
> where it's not lightweigth, for the code there needs much love. that
> said, juk is part of KDE software, while Amarok does not follow the
> KDE rules to be part of the official package. ( same release dates for
> instance )
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Mark <markg85 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Lydia Pintscher
>> <lydia.pintscher at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 03:15, Michael Pyne <mpyne at kde.org> wrote:
>>>> On Monday, August 08, 2011 18:44:40 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>>>>> Juk is an easy target, and in need of love.
>>>>
>>>> Honestly I was going to recommend the same thing.
>>>>
>>>> I don't agree that it's (all) easy (although there is certainly a lot of "low-
>>>> hanging fruit"), but it does have the advantage that I'm at least available by
>>>> email to help guide/mentor.
>>>>
>>>> In addition I will be completing school very soon, which hopefully should add
>>>> some time per day (although that may be offset by the new job I will be
>>>> rotating to soon which will probably involve a longer commute).
>>>>
>>>> Either way, JuK could use some love, there's still someone mostly-active who
>>>> can show interested parties around the codebase and I should have piped in on
>>>> one of these requests awhile ago (but I've always assumed someone else has
>>>> need the help more ;( )
>>>
>>> Thanks guys. I've suggested him to take a look at JuK.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Lydia
>>>
>>> --
>>> Lydia Pintscher
>>> KDE Community Working Group member
>>> http://kde.org - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
>>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just wondering, but why is there Amorok and JuK? Surely Amarok can do
>> everything JuK can right?
>> JuK even looks "a bit" like Amarok.
>> No pun intended!
>>
>> Thanx,
>> Mark
>>
>

Ah oke. Just some idea i have now.. Right now someone is working on a
Phonon QML thing. Wouldn't it be best for JuK to be (mostly) rewritten
using the phonon QML thing? I mean, KDE 5 seems to be going towards
QML, Dolphin seems to go in that direction and Dragon 3 is already
using QML : http://apachelog.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/dragon-player-3/

Just some random thought..

And how do i even need to see YuK? As a foobar alternative for KDE?

Thanx,
Mark