smallish project needed
markg85 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 12 13:57:11 BST 2011
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Lydia Pintscher
<lydia.pintscher at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 03:15, Michael Pyne <mpyne at kde.org> wrote:
>> On Monday, August 08, 2011 18:44:40 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>>> Juk is an easy target, and in need of love.
>> Honestly I was going to recommend the same thing.
>> I don't agree that it's (all) easy (although there is certainly a lot of "low-
>> hanging fruit"), but it does have the advantage that I'm at least available by
>> email to help guide/mentor.
>> In addition I will be completing school very soon, which hopefully should add
>> some time per day (although that may be offset by the new job I will be
>> rotating to soon which will probably involve a longer commute).
>> Either way, JuK could use some love, there's still someone mostly-active who
>> can show interested parties around the codebase and I should have piped in on
>> one of these requests awhile ago (but I've always assumed someone else has
>> need the help more ;( )
> Thanks guys. I've suggested him to take a look at JuK.
> Lydia Pintscher
> KDE Community Working Group member
> http://kde.org - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Just wondering, but why is there Amorok and JuK? Surely Amarok can do
everything JuK can right?
JuK even looks "a bit" like Amarok.
No pun intended!
More information about the kde-core-devel