Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework
thiago at kde.org
Tue Apr 26 08:30:03 BST 2011
On Tuesday, 26 de April de 2011 07:12:32 Tom Albers wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Monday, April 25, 2011 22:12:55 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> > > What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?
> > we really don't want more duplication of code and effort between Qt
> > and
> > kdelibs, and we certainly don't want forks of Qt code in kdelibs.
> Forks? It does sound like to me as we take the base class from Qt and
> improve it for usage within KDE. We've done that for years and years. Does
> this now imply that that's bad practice and kdelibs is closed for such
No, it implies that if it can be done there, it should be done there.
Kdelibs should be for new functionality that doesn't belong in Qt.
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the kde-core-devel