Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework

[Thiago Macieira]

On Tuesday, 26 de April de 2011 07:12:32 Tom Albers wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > On Monday, April 25, 2011 22:12:55 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> > > What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?
> > 
> > we really don't want more duplication of code and effort between Qt
> > and
> > kdelibs, and we certainly don't want forks of Qt code in kdelibs.
> 
> Forks? It does sound like to me as we take the base class from Qt and
> improve it for usage within KDE. We've done that for years and years. Does
> this now imply that that's bad practice and kdelibs is closed for such
> classes?

No, it implies that if it can be done there, it should be done there.

Kdelibs should be for new functionality that doesn't belong in Qt.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110426/4e5ba420/attachment.sig>