Should kde-qt go 4.7 now?

[Thiago Macieira]

On Saturday 18. September 2010 13.43.35 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Friday 10 September 2010, Eike Hein wrote:
> > Thiago and I were wondering.
> > 
> > trunk so far does not depend on 4.7, which makes having
> > kde-qt on 4.6 convenient in terms of developers using it
> > not accidentally introducing code requiring 4.7. Either
> > we ignore that and go to 4.7 anyway for the runtime be-
> > nefits it provides, or we think about making KDE SC 4.6
> > depend on Qt 4.7. Thoughts?
> 
> to keep the thing alive...
> so in the end what we will do?
> basically most of the work i'm doing for kde 4.6 depends on qt 4.7 so would
> be neat to know :p
> 
> i assume since
> http://gitorious.org/+kde-developers/qt/kde-qt/commits/4.7.0-patched
> has been created trunk will go on 4.7 right?

It's currently just the 4.7.0 branch, without patches. I'm waiting for the 
tagging to complete the work.

There's a remote chance the branch will move again before the tagging...

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20100918/4f6dbfc4/attachment.sig>