Keeping binary compatibility

[Alex Merry]

On Monday 04 October 2010 17:49:41 John Layt wrote:
> On Monday 04 October 2010 16:47:00 Lubos Lunak wrote:
> >  That was before 4.5.0, wasn't it? Probably better to leave it as it
> >  is.
> 
> Yes, was in 4.4.0.
> 
> The derived calendar classes still have the old order, will that cause any
> issues with the base and derived classes having different virtual tables?

No, the order of methods in the virtual table is defined by the order of the 
methods in the class they are first defined in (ie: the highest class in the 
heirachy that they appear in).

Alex
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20101004/6aadc868/attachment.sig>