Keeping binary compatibility

John Layt johnlayt at
Mon Oct 4 17:49:41 BST 2010

On Monday 04 October 2010 16:47:00 Lubos Lunak wrote:
>  That was before 4.5.0, wasn't it? Probably better to leave it as it is.

Yes, was in 4.4.0.

The derived calendar classes still have the old order, will that cause any 
issues with the base and derived classes having different virtual tables?



More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list