Keeping binary compatibility

David Jarvie djarvie at
Mon Oct 4 12:02:45 BST 2010

On Fri, October 1, 2010 2:32 pm, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>  Therefore I propose the following:
> - private libraries do not (obviously ...?) install their .h files and do
> use
> NAMELINK_SKIP option in install (see e.g.

Could you please explain why using NAMELINK_SKIP is better for private
libraries? What difference does it make whether links to the shared
library file are created?

David Jarvie.
KDE developer.
KAlarm author -

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list