Keeping binary compatibility
djarvie at kde.org
Mon Oct 4 12:02:45 BST 2010
On Fri, October 1, 2010 2:32 pm, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Therefore I propose the following:
> - private libraries do not (obviously ...?) install their .h files and do
> NAMELINK_SKIP option in install (see e.g.
Could you please explain why using NAMELINK_SKIP is better for private
libraries? What difference does it make whether links to the shared
library file are created?
KAlarm author - http://www.astrojar.org.uk/kalarm
More information about the kde-core-devel