"Cornelius's grand plan" - Merging KDElibs into Qt
mat69 at gmx.net
Mon Nov 1 12:11:00 GMT 2010
Am Sonntag 31 Oktober 2010, 18:28:50 schrieb todd rme:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:
> > A Diumenge, 31 d'octubre de 2010, todd rme va escriure:
> > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Michael Jansen <kde at michael-
> > jansen.biz>wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 31 October 2010 12:33:22 Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> > > > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I think this sounds like the place to start, for several reasons:
> > >
> > > 5. Licensing shouldn't be as much of a problem
> > How come?
> > Abert
> 1. Because there is unlikely to be as many developers with rights to the
> 2. Because it would be easier to re-implement the changes if need be, since
> they are smaller
And what is with
"3. Developers not agreeing with the licensing at all"?
I suppose this is what aacid was refering to.
And as he has mentioned before he is one that opposes such a move, with good
And no a svn blame would not be enough, you would have to track down the whole
history. Because derivative work would not be allowed!
Who would track that all down and who would rewrite code that would need
Imo this would end up as a waste of time, better to modularize KDE on its own,
than to move as much as possible into Qt.
More information about the kde-core-devel