KDE/kdelibs

[Peter Penz]

On Monday 22 March 2010 23:38:59 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Segunda-feira 22. Março 2010, às 23.24.51, Raphael Kubo da Costa 
escreveu:
> > On Monday 22 March 2010 19:21:16 Peter Penz wrote:
> > >  A             kfile/kcommentwidget.cpp   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > >  A             kfile/kcommentwidget_p.h   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > >  A             kfile/kedittagsdialog.cpp   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > >  A             kfile/kedittagsdialog_p.h   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > >  A             kfile/kfilemetadataconfigurationwidget.cpp   [License:
> > >  LGPL
> > > 
> > > (v2)] A             kfile/kfilemetadataconfigurationwidget.h  
> > > [License: LGPL (v2)] A             kfile/kfilemetadataprovider.cpp  
> > > [License: LGPL (v2)] A             kfile/kfilemetadataprovider_p.h  
> > > [License: LGPL (v2)] A             kfile/kfilemetadatawidget.cpp  
> > > [License: LGPL (v2)] A
> > > 
> > >       kfile/kfilemetadatawidget.h   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > >  
> > >  A             kfile/kloadfilemetadatathread.cpp   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > >  A             kfile/kloadfilemetadatathread_p.h   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > >  A             kfile/knfotranslator.cpp   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > >  A             kfile/knfotranslator_p.h   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > >  A             kfile/ktaggingwidget.cpp   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > >  A             kfile/ktaggingwidget_p.h   [License: LGPL (v2)]
> > 
> > Since this is kdelibs code, shouldn't the license be LGPLv2.1+?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> LGPLv2.1+ or LGPLv2+3+eV.

Thanks for the hint, I've just committed an update (I took the text from 
existing kdelibs files).