Git Migration Needs YOU!

Chani chanika at
Wed Mar 3 01:23:04 GMT 2010

On March 2, 2010 17:00:19 Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On March 1, 2010, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> >> On Monday 01 March 2010 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> >>> playground should be left up to the people working on things in there.
> >> 
> >> So how does a project in playground become part of the git migration?
> > 
> > imho: do it yourself. there's a lot of dead code in playground and even
> > more uninteresting bits of history in there.
> > 
> > it's tempting to say that git relieves a lot of the need for a playground
> > like module since it's easy to create new modules on the fly.
> I hope kde svn will stay up for some time after (preferably even
> indefinitely)? Read-only of course, and/or I suppose it would be okay to
> drop things that got moved. I am just thinking I don't want to see
> playground simply vanish, especially as I know I have some things in
> there I want to keep (at least to git-svn clone onto my own machine(s)
> if nothing else), but might not get to in a timely fashion.

well, svn will stick around for at *least* as long as the translators are 
using it. :) and it makes sense to me to keep it around for historical 
purposes too - I'm not sure if every git repo will have 100% perfect history?

This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list