Review Request: the nepomuk part will not be build

[Sebastian Trueg]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2575/#review3689
-----------------------------------------------------------


Actually Nepomuk needs Virtuoso for data storage and the redland backend for memory storage in several places. So, no, we need both of them.

- Sebastian


On 2010-01-13 18:29:38, Guy Maurel wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2575/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-01-13 18:29:38)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> The site http://userbase.kde.org/Akonadi#Nepomuk
> 
> speaks about some backend for nepomuk. This is (I thought) as one have to choose one.
> Under kdebase/runtime/CMakeLists.txt one can find at line 59 the condition
> if(Nepomuk_FOUND AND STRIGI_STRIGIQTDBUSCLIENT_LIBRARY AND SOPRANO_PLUGIN_REDLANDBACKEND_FOUND AND SOPRANO_PLUGIN_VIRTUOSOBACKEND_FOUND AND SOPRANO_PLUGIN_RAPTORPARSER_FOUND)
> 
> I have only two of them, and the nepomuk part is not build.
> I think, this is wrong. Should not it be?
> if(Nepomuk_FOUND AND STRIGI_STRIGIQTDBUSCLIENT_LIBRARY AND (SOPRANO_PLUGIN_REDLANDBACKEND_FOUND OR SOPRANO_PLUGIN_VIRTUOSOBACKEND_FOUND OR SOPRANO_PLUGIN_RAPTORPARSER_FOUND))
> 
> I try it, and the nepomuk part is build.
> 
> see: CMakeLists-gm-113.diff
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/KDE/kdebase/runtime/CMakeLists.txt 1070855 
> 
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2575/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guy
> 
>