Policy on kcm module naming

[Sascha Peilicke]

On Wednesday 28 April 2010 20:20:47 Andriy Rysin wrote:
> Is there a policy on kcm module naming?
> 
> Looks like most names in kcmshell4 --list output are just 'name' but
> there quite a few with kcm'name' and kcm_'name'. The last two seems to
> be used
> 
> Seems pretty standard to name the libraries kcm_name but not for
> desktop files.

IMHO it should be kcm_name for all modules. At least it should be the same 
scheme for all modules.

In the meantime, I submitted a patch to reviewboard to make kcmshell4 look for 
all three combinations if you type only 'name' [1].

Footnotes: 
 [1] http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3829/
-- 
Sascha Peilicke
http://saschpe.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20100428/9161c4bf/attachment.sig>