Thread-safety issue in KConfig / KStandardDirs ?
Thiago Macieira
thiago at kde.org
Sat Apr 24 10:09:49 BST 2010
Em Sábado 24. Abril 2010, às 10.53.27, Oswald Buddenhagen escreveu:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:36:45PM -0300, Sandro Andrade wrote:
> > KConfig / KStandardDirs are thread-safe ?
>
> kstandarddirs' thread-safety is documented.
> kconfig is most definitely not thread-safe, but it is re-entrant. you
> may get lucky with the const methods just like in kstddirs.
Besides, the crash was in malloc. Malloc is thread-safe.
Unless, of course, you've already done memory smashing and destroyed malloc
control data.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20100424/369c92c4/attachment.sig>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list