[PATCH] Detecting notification popup server capabilities

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On September 1, 2009, Kåre Särs wrote:
> For me, the most elegant solution would be to have the cancel action in the
> power-management plasmoid (assuming it is running) and not in the
> notification it self.

the challenge with putting it in the plasmoid is that there's a lot of other 
content in there. it's contextually correct, but could easily get lost.

> My point being that the "critical" actions probably should not be in the
> notifications.

or maybe critical notifications with actions should be more pronounced...

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Framework
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090902/02813c8b/attachment.sig>