Using reviewboard.kde.org for kde-core-devel?

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Friday 27 March 2009, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
> I investigated review board last year and while it was nice I ended up
> finding more negative things then positive and wouldn't recommend it
> to any project if they had the choice.   I wrote up all my notes along
> with a comparison of the current other review systems out there.

that's nice but we don't use git across kde right now, nobody has pioneered a 
github or gitorious based system and reviewboard is actually working quite 
nicely and has been doing so for about a year now.

i'd love to see kde move to git and corresponding tools. can you help that 
become a reality?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090327/bd81c2fa/attachment.sig>