kdesupport/polkit-qt question

dantti85-dev at yahoo.com.br dantti85-dev at yahoo.com.br
Wed Mar 11 22:44:26 GMT 2009

Yep, thanks, you're right :P
I think we stuck too much on stable and
forgot that our train is running we should
stay more tunned with polkit.

It's has been reworked a lot so for we to
catch it again i think it'll take time.
We will take more care about the isolation
you told too.
Maybe we should remove polkit-qt from kdesupport
so kde/qt users don't start coding old stuff like
we did.


De: Kevin Ottens <ervin at kde.org>
Para: kde-core-devel at kde.org; drf54321 at gmail.com
Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 11 de Março de 2009 18:50:02
Assunto: Re: kdesupport/polkit-qt question

On Wednesday 11 March 2009 22:25:54 Dario Freddi wrote:
> In data mercoledì 11 marzo 2009 22:20:25, Sebastian Sauer ha scritto:
> > While on it; is it possible to move the polkit-includes from the *.h to
> > the *.cpp files to be later able to provide e.g. a dummy-backend that
> > just allows everything?
> I fear not, but we can try harder.

I'd advise you to revise your design then and ensure a better isolation of the 
lower level libraries. Otherwise it'll be a pain to maintain, keep in mind 
that PolicyKit is a moving target (and a faster one than you think, see my 
other mail in this thread, the libs you're using are already obsolete and gone 
in git).

Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
"Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
Ne font reculer l'ignorance."

      Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090311/749bdefb/attachment.htm>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list