New authorization library moved to kdereview
nicola.gigante at gmail.com
Fri Jul 17 22:07:42 BST 2009
Il giorno 17/lug/09, alle ore 22:30, Matthew Woehlke ha scritto:
> If it is qt-only, and you have no current plans of using KDE
> libraries, kdesupport (or even an independent repo) might be better
> since that could better encourage use by qt-only applications as
> well as KDE.
> Just a thought...
It doesn't have to remain qt-only. It just doesn't need kdelibs at the
moment. Anyway, I think that as more kde apps starts using it, it
could become something like a system technology. For this reason I
wouldn't like to put it on a separate repository. It's future
development should remain tight to kde.
Do you think kdesupport is a right place? Would the inclusion in
kdelibs make a wide adoption easier?
If I complete my gsoc project, i should develop an addition to kcm to
use this library for administrative modules (like kdm for example). In
this case, I think it being in kdelibs makes things easier.
Anyway, thank you
P.S. anybody has feedback to the code or the APIs? This is the time
More information about the kde-core-devel