KDE browser work team

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday 02 July 2009, Benjamin Meyer wrote:
> (work on) Arora will soon have everything that I needed in a browser
> that I used to use Konqueror for.

and the KDE integration? (network settings, cookies, etc, etc)

proper KDE WebKit integration, and not just in a kpart (but also available as 
one), would be brilliant as it would allow applications that use webkit 
(though not as a kpart) to also take advantage of these things.

and this is why i suggest on my blog that people NOT discuss the issue of 
"which application, Konqueror or <foo>". 

it's a much more difficult discussion to have: people that would be in support 
of WebKit will be pro-Konqueror, and you'll just split the WebKit effort in 
two halves, dividing and conquering the entire process from within.

it also misses the point that we're talking about, or at least should be 
talking about, WebKit's availability to KDE in general. that goes beyond a web 
browser, and writing one more baroque application that uses WebKit internally 
(Arora) does not help that goal forward one bit.

so can we please focus on the core issue here of KDE and WebKit integration? 
it's something we can get consensus on, something that will benefit much more 
than just the web browser and something that needs to be done regardless of 
which applications are eventually chosen.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090702/c5b14503/attachment.sig>