Fate vs Bugzilla for feature tracking

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 21.01.09 17:18:40, Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 January 2009 11:07:17 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > hello =)
> >
> > after a few weeks of (patient :) consultation with the Suse team working on
> > Fate, i just blogged about the possibility of using Fate for feature
> > tracking in KDE. you can read about it here:
> >
> > 	http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2009/01/do-you-believe-in-fate.html
> >
> > so i won't bother repeating it all over again in this email.
> >
> > it would be good if we could discuss this issue. i'm not really convinced
> > personally about whether Fate is The Solution for us or not, but i'm also
> > really unsatisfied with Bugzilla-as-feature-coordinator.
> >
> > discuss! =)
> 
> I have yet to see anything concrete from you (or anybody else except lemma) 
> regarding things that would make Bugzilla easier for them or their group 
> (other than your s/wishlist/feature request/ priority change that i royally 
> screwed up and have yet to redo). If you know what you want, I can make it 
> happen, we don't have to worry about another system, everybody's happy.

Oh, I just found something that I would find pretty useful: Grouping of
query results. Currently all I can do is order the result by one of the
columns, but I'd also like to group them by another property. This would
allow to see all bugs for a product, grouped by component and orderd by
priority, which makes it easy to pick a good task to start next :)

Andreas

-- 
Expect the worst, it's the least you can do.