Is Qt4.5 required for trunk now?

[Chani]

> > >
> > > Indeed. Besides that, some of the hacks that have been removed actually
> > > break things on Qt 4.5 (because they relied on bugy behaviour in Qt
> > > 4.4), so it's not as easy as just reverting them...
> >
> > Then maybe we should (in the future anyway) simply update kdelibs
> > requirement when qt-copy is updated to a new (non-bugfix) version and
> > more importantly also announce that requirement change?
>
> That would make sense IMO.

so... is 4.5 officially required yet? I get the impression it's required in 
practice, so..

-- 
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
www.chani3.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090214/12d4894c/attachment.sig>