Libical: Increasing Minimum Version Requirement

[Matthew Woehlke]

Allen Winter wrote:
> On Friday 06 February 2009 3:54:55 pm Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> [I]f I have to, I should be able to build from the SRPM.)
>
> Or from a normal, plain old vanilla source code tarball.

...which means I now have an untracked package overriding the system 
package? No, thanks. That only works if I plan to continue to maintain 
the package myself until I reinstall the OS.

>> How critical is 0.42 versus 0.41? I ask because I am still on Fedora 9 
>
> version 0.42 adds a bug fix that has been haunting us PIMsters for
> years and I really want to eliminate for good.

As long as there is a reason other than "because we can" :-)...

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
Yesterday, I thought of the best .sig that has ever been contemplated. 
Alas, I forgot it before I could write it down.