Nepomuk as hard dependency in future?

[Tobias Koenig]

On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:59:17PM +0100, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Volker Krause wrote:
Hej,

> > Making Nepomuk integration optional is quite difficult once you start to
> > depend on it for essential features of your application though. And at
> > least for KDE PIM, I expect that to happen. In fact, distibution list
> > resolution already depends on it in some cases.
> 
> We didn't have a real conclusion here.
> So nepomuk stays optional for KDE 4.4 ?
We need a hard dependency of nepomuk for kdepim in KDE 4.4,
otherwise some important parts of Akonadi won't work as expected
which will cast a damning light on Akonadi and the freshly ported
applications... So please mark it as hard dependency finally!

Ciao,
Tobias
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20091201/d2497e65/attachment.sig>