RFC: adding a temporary, non-BC gauranteed, 'private' library .. where?
nospam at vuorela.dk
Thu Apr 23 19:09:58 BST 2009
On 2009-04-23, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> BTW, I'm not saying the above idea is good (in fact I think its the
> worst solution), but I'd like to understand the bad downsides for you
> packagers when one of the libraries kdelibs changes its SONAME.
Because we have based our packaging on your (KDE's) earlier promises tha
kdelibs was backwards binary compatible thru all of kde4.x
More information about the kde-core-devel