apaku at gmx.de
Wed Apr 8 15:41:37 BST 2009
On 08.04.09 14:08:26, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 of April 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 07.04.09 21:21:47, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > > 2009/4/7 Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de>:
> > > > On 07.04.09 21:12:30, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > > >> SVN commit 950837 by rkcosta:
> > > >>
> > > >> Make killJob a private slot.
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't it rather be Q_PRIVATE_SLOT(d,_k_killJob()) and then the
> > > > _k_killJob method would be a member of the Private class?
> > >
> > > I don't know. Would it make any difference?
> > Yes, because that allows to rename/remove the slot without breaking binary
> > compatibility, while with the current private slot you can't ever change
> > the slot in any way.
> How does changing a private: slot affect binary compatibility in any way?
Hmm, guess I need to be more explicit, of course I only meant the
signature, not the actual implementation.
It is so very hard to be an
More information about the kde-core-devel