Suspicious code in revision 867140 (Left Items)

[André Wöbbeking]

On Wednesday 08 October 2008, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:

> I see that my adivce is quite exaggerated. However another advice is
> to always have a default case for switch blocks that catches the
> impossible cases. Because the extra value is such an invalid case it
> would be caught by the default case.

I know that it's recommended by some C++ gurus but I'm also not happy 
with it as you don't get compiler warnings if you forget enum values in 
a switch block.