kdereview exemption for PolicyKit-KDE

Kevin Krammer kevin.krammer at gmx.at
Sun Nov 16 19:22:01 GMT 2008

On Sunday 16 November 2008, Trever Fischer wrote:

> If KDE had a tighter integration with policykit, that'd be really slick.
> However, these are just the KDE gui bits. Our code is just a KDE frontend
> to the authenticator. Without this in 4.2, KDE can still use policykit, but
> it requires the user to have PolicyKit-gnome installed to authenticate or
> change the default permissions.

Then why not just move it to kdereview and after the usual review period to 

Distributions can then still package the latest stable version together with 


Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20081116/fea95b45/attachment.sig>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list