JuK feature/bugfix; thoughts?

[Michael Pyne]

On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Monday 12 May 2008 22:52:23 Michael Pyne wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Reason I'm asking is because we're in feature freeze now (I always pick
> > the best times to come back in port :) and I don't want to simply try and
> > stretch the definition of "bugfix" that far.
> >
> > The patch itself is relatively non-intrusive and read-only (although
> > testing is always appreciated).  Is this OK, or should I wait for trunk
> > to be open for KDE 4.2?
>
> Michael,
>
> I don't see a problem implementing this in trunk for the 4.1 release.
> I'd put this in the category of "small potatoes" :)

It has been committed as of 807472.  I will also update the changelog.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080513/5b417c37/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080513/5b417c37/attachment.sig>