Don't call KJob::emitResult() from KJob::start() ?

[Kevin Ottens]

Le Thursday 26 June 2008, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau a écrit :
> Is this intended?

Yup.

> If it is, is the attached patch for the API dox okay to commit, especially
> the extension of the KJob::start() docs?

It has my blessing. Good job!

Regards.
-- 
Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
"Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
Ne font reculer l'ignorance."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080626/50db2f4f/attachment.sig>