Use of library names (Akonadi, Solid, Nepomuk, Phonon etc.) in user interfaces

[Casper Clemence]

I'll be brief, as the correspondence on this topic appears to be growing
exponentially.

I think the best solution is to always have access to functions by
descriptive titles e.g. Nepomuk="tagging and searching", but to _always_
mention the name of the service.

I am convinced that mentioning the name can make the KDE experience much
clearer for the user. They don't have to learn the names but as they do they
start to see how everything fits together. When you realise that tagging
your photos, tagging your music and performing desktop searches are all part
of one thing it becomes easier to comprehend.

Casper
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080610/e24d44c5/attachment.htm>