GLib/GObject+C as the lingua franca?

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Sunday 27 July 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Sunday 27 July 2008, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > In particular, in case of an LGPL'd library a Qt dependency is not
> > an option.
>
> /me looks at kdelibs, then at Ingo
>
> i understand what you're meaning to say here (that if someone wants
> to write an LGPL'd library that anyone can use with no GPL strings
> due to dependencies, then Qt isn't an option at this point), but the
> way you phrased it is a bit misleading to the more innocent reader =)

Indeed. Thanks for clarifying what I meant to write.

I owe you a cookie or beer redeemable at Akademy. ;-)


Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080728/4865ed9a/attachment.sig>