Request for breaking hard feature freeze for an important Plasma feature ; )

[Simon Edwards]

Peter Penz wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1. July 2008 00:26:46 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> [...]
>> it's really basic code without any real trickinesses to it and would help
>> with the plasmalash. i'm ok with waiting for 4.2, but i'm not sure our
>> users are. =P
> 
> I'm sure most users see this as bug. +1 from my side for fixing this "bug" :-) 
> 
> Seriosly: Plasma is in really good shape in 4.1, but I fear this minor thing 
> might open the door for (yet another) plasma bashing if it won't be fixed...

I agree. If this feature is missing it likely to be experienced as a 
(biggish) bug by users. Provided there is low chance of this feature 
impacting stability or causing breakage etc etc, I would say that not 
having this feature is worse than having it but there being a few bugs 
left in it.

I say put it in, and we'll take any bug risks. (It sounds pretty safe 
according to Aaron anyway).

cheers,

-- 
Simon Edwards             | KDE-NL, Guidance tools, Guarddog Firewall
simon-9Y692TG1RWtl57MIdRCFDg at public.gmane.org       | http://www.simonzone.com/software/
Nijmegen, The Netherlands | "ZooTV? You made the right choice."