Giving up our applications' identity? (was: Re: KDE)

pinheiro nuno at oxygen-icons.org
Tue Jan 15 13:02:32 GMT 2008


A Tuesday 15 January 2008 09:38:42, Brad Hards escreveu:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2008 01:54:09 pm Jakob Petsovits wrote:
> > I might agree to that (and would admit having pushed stuff too far in
> > some places), but nonetheless there was a reasoning for this - the idea
> > is that common base applications without the need for a separate brand
> > (calculator, basic text editor, audio mixer) get generic icons.
>
> Why? What happens when I have two (or three, or four) calculators? I see
> this type of rebranding / generic branding as a distro function.
>
> > Hope I didn't intimidate too many people with that icon crap in KDE 4 :-P
>
> I think you annoyed them.
>
> If you want to screw around with icons, perhaps fixing things that don't
> have icons would be better than rebranding existing stuff? See
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SebastianVahl/KDE4MissingIcons
>
> Brad

Might be a good idea to fill those in the oxygen missing icons page ......

http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Oxygen/Missing_Icons

-- 

core oxygen icon designer




More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list