[PATCH] Multi-Protocol IO-Slave

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Saturday 12 January 2008, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> This is my first and last comment to this thread but i really don't see why
> we want that in KDE, it seems to me that we already support everything
> gio/gvfs does and probably better since our KIOs have been much more tested
> that their new gio/gvfs code, so i don't see the point in this unless it's

i don't think the benefits have really been communicated at all, no.

> another dcop sucks let's invent dbus say it's the standard and the force it
> into everyone else.

a big difference between this and the dbus issue is that dbus/dcop *is* the 
protocol while the protocols here are http, ftp, ssh, wedav, etc. and 
KIO/GIO/whatever stuff on top are just accessors to it. the difference is 
fundamental.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080112/78a30e0b/attachment.sig>