kio_giobridge IO slave
kevin.krammer at gmx.at
Sat Jan 5 16:16:45 GMT 2008
On Saturday 05 January 2008, David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 03 January 2008, nf2 wrote:
> > Furthermore there is a "OverrulesProtocols" parameter to
> > override some protocols which KIO already provides.
> I don't really like this. It means that when a user says "smb:/ doesn't
> work" we have almost no way of knowing if he's using kio_smb or
> kio_giobridge... User support will be very difficult if not impossible in
> those conditions. The user himself might not know which one he's using, if
> it depends on some distro package being installed for instance. Shouldn't
> the kio_giobridge kioslave use different protocol names instead?
I'd rather have this as an environment variable or a config entry, with a
preference on the config entry since environment variables basically require
that the users know which shell config files are sourced by their shell in
non-interactive mode (when startkde runs) and interactive mode (when they
have a shell in Konsole).
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the kde-core-devel