DrKonqui appearance (was: Re: New KMessageBox Style )

[Olivier Goffart]

Le mardi 5 février 2008, John Tapsell a écrit :
> On 05/02/2008, Chani <chanika at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On February 5, 2008 21:09:41 Robert Knight wrote:
> > > On a broader note, requiring the user to actually go to bugs.kde.org
> > > to file a report and copy in the backtrace probably means that the
> > > majority of crashes are never reported at all.  Windows has been
> > > sending automated crash reports for years now and I believe Gnome does
> > > as well.
> >
> > how much use is a backtrace, really, without a user to discuss it with
> > (and probably without debug packages, too)?
>
> Pretty useful actually :-)  Just knowing what line it crashed on is
> often good enough.

I don't agree here.
What you need to do to be able to fix the bug is to reproduce it. And a 
explaination on how to reproduce is just much better than a single backtrace.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20080206/91de7aea/attachment.sig>