Qt SVG renderer

[Tor Arne Vestbø]

Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Thanks for this awesome chart!

Happy to contribute :)

> As Rafael said, I'm a bit surprised that 
> WebKit seems to be *worse* in several ways, it looks like maybe it does 
> not support object opacity? 

That was my thinking too. Remember though that this is using WebKit from 
Qt 4.4. I tried a couple of them in WebKit trunk (which Qt 4.5 will be 
based on), and they look a lot better. I'll try to add an entry in the 
chart for trunk when I get the chance.

> I think it would be nice if your "compare" frame was gradiated so that 
> the dithering artifacts aren't so visible (after all, it's acceptable if 
> QtSvg and librsvg use different dithering algorithms!).

I agree. The reason the comparison is b/w is because these results come 
from our internal test system, which was built for regression testing of 
  pixel perfect drawing. I will see if I can hack something together for 
this specific case.

I'm going on a two week sick leave now though, so feel free to enhance 
on these results.

Tor Arne


-- 
Tor Arne Vestbø, Software Engineer
Qt Software, Nokia, Oslo, Norway
http://www.trolltech.com/