Qt SVG renderer
Tor Arne Vestbø
tavestbo at trolltech.com
Thu Aug 7 18:20:12 BST 2008
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Thanks for this awesome chart!
Happy to contribute :)
> As Rafael said, I'm a bit surprised that
> WebKit seems to be *worse* in several ways, it looks like maybe it does
> not support object opacity?
That was my thinking too. Remember though that this is using WebKit from
Qt 4.4. I tried a couple of them in WebKit trunk (which Qt 4.5 will be
based on), and they look a lot better. I'll try to add an entry in the
chart for trunk when I get the chance.
> I think it would be nice if your "compare" frame was gradiated so that
> the dithering artifacts aren't so visible (after all, it's acceptable if
> QtSvg and librsvg use different dithering algorithms!).
I agree. The reason the comparison is b/w is because these results come
from our internal test system, which was built for regression testing of
pixel perfect drawing. I will see if I can hack something together for
this specific case.
I'm going on a two week sick leave now though, so feel free to enhance
on these results.
Tor Arne
--
Tor Arne Vestbø, Software Engineer
Qt Software, Nokia, Oslo, Norway
http://www.trolltech.com/
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list