Why don't the KConfig* classes have reference counting on their d-pointers, value semantics?

[Richard Dale]

On Tuesday 01 April 2008 18:23:00 Matthias Kretz wrote:
> suggestions for a name, so far we got
> - KConfigure
> I'll add
> - KConfiguration
> - KSettings (probably not a good idea - it doesn't extend QSettings, but
> KConfig)
> - KConfig2
I think KConfiguration is better than KConfigure that I suggested.

-- Richard