Permission to break feature freeze for Nepomuk and Soprano

[Sebastian Trüg]

Sorry, 

no, it has not been completed. I wanted to provide a proper speed comparision 
first. I will come back with details tomorrow.

Cheers,
Sebastian

On Monday 17 September 2007 13:29:19 Allen Winter wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Has this been completed?
> If not, can you give us a status report?
> -Allen
>
> On Monday 03 September 2007 9:43:13 am Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > there has been a long silence around Nepomuk. Well, the main reason is
> > that I was working heaviliy on Soprano2 [1]. It comes with a bunch of new
> > features, a much cleaner API, a server/client architecture (quite simple
> > but waaaay faster than DBus), and I intend to replace the Nepomuk
> > middleware with it. I already did it locally and a commit "should" not
> > break anything once Soprano2 is copied to kdesupport.
> >
> > The main advantage of all this is: speed. No more DBus for requesting
> > data. It is now done via tcp (and I would love some tips and help to add
> > support for unix socket communication)
> >
> > If there are no objections until this evening I will proceed (I know it
> > is short notice but I don't think it is such a big deal yet.)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sebastian
> >
> > [1] branches/work/sorano2